Go Back   SeatStaysUp.com - Beer, Babes, Cars, Guns, Sports, Games! > It's All In Your Mind > Politics & Religion
 

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Concealed Carry National Reciprocity: HR 197
Old 03-27-2009, 03:57 PM   #1
sb427f-car
SSU's Drinks / Smokes Dir

 
sb427f-car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Balto Co. Maryland
Posts: 6,292
Send a message via AIM to sb427f-car

sb427f-car is offline
  Reply With Quote

Quote:
Tiahrt Co-sponsors 2nd Amendment Self Defense Bill
03/27/09

WASHINGTON—U.S. Congressman Todd Tiahrt (R-Goddard) today co-sponsored the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Bill (H.R. 197). This legislation would protect the rights of licensed firearm permit holders by allowing them to carry firearms across the country without a confusing patchwork system.

"The National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Bill recognizes that those who have a valid state-issued concealed firearms permit should not have to forfeit their safety when traveling," said Tiahrt. "Not only does this bill protect the rights of concealed firearm permit holders, it also maintains the right of states to issue concealed weapons permits as they desire. As a mobile society, legal firearm permit carriers should be able to travel from state to state and exercise their fundamental right to self defense—this legislation ensures that."

Specifically, the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Bill would allow any person with a valid concealed firearm carrying permit or license, issued by a state, to carry a concealed firearm in any state, as follows:

* In states that issue concealed firearm permits, a state’s laws governing where concealed firearms may be carried would apply within its borders.
* In states that do not issue carry permits, a federal "bright-line" standard would permit carrying in places other than police stations; courthouses; public polling places; meetings of state, county, or municipal governing bodies; schools; passenger areas of airports; and certain other locations.
* The bill applies to D.C., Puerto Rico and U.S. territories.
* It would not create a federal licensing system; it would require the states to recognize each others’ carry permits, just as they recognize drivers’ licenses and carry permits held by armored car guards.
http://www.tiahrt.house.gov/?section...14&itemid=1094
__________________
-Aaron
“It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, who keep on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men”-SAMUEL ADAMS, 1776


ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
  View Public Profile Find More Posts by sb427f-car
 
 
Old 03-27-2009, 04:01 PM   #2
StoleIt
Stealth Moderator

 
StoleIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Columbus, MS
Posts: 2,517

StoleIt is online now
  Reply With Quote

Oh please God pass!!!
__________________

"..denial can be seductive, but it has an insidious side effect. For all the peace of mind
deniers think they get by saying it isn’t so, the fall they take when faced with new
violence is all the more unsettling. Denial is a save-now-pay-later scheme, a contract
written entirely in small print, for in the long run, the denying person knows the
truth on some level." - Lt. Col. Dave Grossman
  View Public Profile Visit StoleIt's homepage! Find More Posts by StoleIt
 
 
Old 03-27-2009, 04:04 PM   #3
CashMoney
SSU Resident
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Noblesville, IN
Posts: 853
Send a message via AIM to CashMoney Send a message via Yahoo to CashMoney

CashMoney is offline
  Reply With Quote

hopefully there isn't anything hidden in there like serialized ammo or some ****.... but Please if that is not there PLEASE GOD>. Let it Pass.
__________________
Winston Churchill-"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of misery.."
  View Public Profile Find More Posts by CashMoney
 
 
Old 03-27-2009, 04:06 PM   #4
sb427f-car
SSU's Drinks / Smokes Dir

 
sb427f-car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Balto Co. Maryland
Posts: 6,292
Send a message via AIM to sb427f-car

sb427f-car is offline
  Reply With Quote

It's from Todd Tiahrt, who has authored the Tiahrt amendment regarding NICS checks and trace data for firearms purchases in every BATFE funding bill for the last 10 years or so.

He is a good guy.

I do question the legality and Constitutionality of this bill however.
__________________
-Aaron
“It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, who keep on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men”-SAMUEL ADAMS, 1776


ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
  View Public Profile Find More Posts by sb427f-car
 
 
Old 03-27-2009, 04:46 PM   #5
presto_z
SSU Resident

 
presto_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: sw fl.
Posts: 879
Send a message via AIM to presto_z Send a message via MSN to presto_z

presto_z is online now
  Reply With Quote

fingers crossed on this one
__________________
  View Public Profile Find More Posts by presto_z
 
 
Old 03-27-2009, 05:51 PM   #6
dropped_71chevy
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

 
dropped_71chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 3,498

dropped_71chevy is online now
  Reply With Quote

Quote:
Originally Posted by sb427f-car View Post
I do question the legality and Constitutionality of this bill however.
Yeah, who gives a damn about states rights?

I like the idea of it but I'm torn because of the states rights aspect.
__________________
- Tim
  View Public Profile Find More Posts by dropped_71chevy
 
 
Old 03-27-2009, 06:01 PM   #7
It'llrun
SSU Fanatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 1,859

It'llrun is offline
  Reply With Quote

It's a step in the correct direction...
  View Public Profile Find More Posts by It'llrun
 
 
Old 03-27-2009, 06:04 PM   #8
infinitebird
SSU Elite

 
infinitebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 6,594
Send a message via AIM to infinitebird

infinitebird is offline
  Reply With Quote

Quote:
Originally Posted by dropped_71chevy View Post
Yeah, who gives a damn about states rights?

I like the idea of it but I'm torn because of the states rights aspect.
Well I think full faith and credit should apply to a situation like this, so it is Constitutional imo.

"States rights" are the rights reserved to the states not in the Constitution. Honoring other states legal documents is though.
  View Public Profile Find More Posts by infinitebird
 
 
Old 03-27-2009, 06:07 PM   #9
It'llrun
SSU Fanatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 1,859

It'llrun is offline
  Reply With Quote

Since the Right to bear arms is specifically in the Constitution, this bill won't be violating anything imo... 10th Amendment is pretty clear about what rights a state has.
  View Public Profile Find More Posts by It'llrun
 
 
Old 03-28-2009, 10:39 AM   #10
cantdrv65
SSU Elite
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: TEXASS
Posts: 6,832

cantdrv65 is offline
  Reply With Quote

I hope this bill passes, but I doubt it has even a slim chance of being allowed to a vote (Pelosi will never allow it) much less of being signed into law.
__________________
"Believe those who are seeking the truth, doubt those who find it." Andre Gide
  View Public Profile Find More Posts by cantdrv65
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.